Risk Assessments
at Small Community Banks
The enterprise wide risk assessment has become an important
tool at large complex banks. Every year
risk managers are tasked with developing a wide ranging assessment of the
overall risk at the bank and the mitigation in place to address this risk. They
us sophisticated modeling tools and expensive software to help with the development
of these behemoths. But what about a
small bank? Isn’t the overall level of risk
evident? Why should a small $300 million bank take the time? In our opinion, no Bank is too small to need
a complete risk assessment
What is a Bank Risk Assessment?
In large part, the question of whether or not to perform a
risk assessment becomes more pressing depending on how one defines a risk assessment. A risk assessment is defined in Investopedia
as “
“The process of identification, analysis and either
acceptance or mitigation of uncertainty in investment decision-making.
Essentially, risk
management occurs anytime an investor or fund manager analyzes and attempts to
quantify the potential for losses in an investment and then takes the
appropriate action (or inaction) given their investment objectives and risk
tolerance. Inadequate risk management can result in severe consequences for
companies as well as individuals. For example, the recession that began in 2008
was largely caused by the loose credit risk management of financial firms.”
We believe that this definition means that risk assessments should
be performed by all financial institutions.
The risk assessment is the Bank’s opportunity to establish the level of
appetite for risk. In doing so the Board
establishes the limits of how must risk it is willing to take to reach its
overall strategic goals. Put another
way a risk assessment at a small bank is an excellent opportunity for the bank
to take stock of what it is doing and where it is going! In completing an
effective risk assessment the Bank has the opportunity to look at the skill and
experience level of staff, the training available, the current IT systems in
place and to weigh all these against the lending opportunities at the Bank.
A risk assessment is different from a strategic plan in that
the strategic plan looks to find opportunities available to a financial institution
and how best to exploit those opportunities.
The risk assessments looks at the opportunities juxtaposed the inherent
risk at the financial institution. Put
another way, there may a great number of opportunities available in auto
lending, but these opportunities can only result in profits, if the Bank has
the proper infrastructure to exploit the opportunity. The risk assessment allows the bank to take
complete and honest stock of its abilities, capabilities and limitations. Does the bank have the software, the knowledge
and the staff that are capable of making all of the required disclosures? Without these, the opportunity that seemed
like such a good idea can become nightmare of regulatory enforcement
actions!
Finding Hidden Risk
For smaller banks, the greatest areas of risk are often
unrecognized. With smaller levels of
capital and limited assets, the smaller bank has a thin margin for error. One or two big loans that become
nonperforming can create capital and other operating concerns. There have been myriad changes in the regulations
that apply to banks in the areas of consumer lending, BSA/AML and Fair Lending
to name a few. For those banks that
consider themselves business lenders, the fact that many of these regulations blend
over into commercial lending can come as quite a shock. By performing a risk assessment that
considers which regulations apply to the Bank and the staff’s overall
familiarity with necessary steps for compliance can save the institution a great deal of embarrassment
and money!
The risk assessment gives the Bank an opportunity to research
the ways to disburse risk, take full advantage of opportunities that exist in the
assessment area and to establish a framework to make the strategic plan, one
that will help the Bank grow safely and within its own capabilities.
Each Risk Assessment
is Unique.
Jon Danielsson, the director of the Systemic Risk Centre at
the London School of Economics notes that:
“If the authorities pick one modeling approach over another,
they may just as easily be backing the wrong horse, a model that is less
accurate, affording financial institutions and the financial system less
protection in the future. For this reason, it is generally better for financial
institutions to develop their own models internally”
Source: Inconsistent Risk
Assessment by Banks Isn't That Bad- John Carney CNBC
Each Bank has its own characteristics that make it
unique. Everything from the make-up of the
Board, the experience and skill of the staff, the relationship with the local
community must be consider in its proper place as part of a complete and effective
risk assessment. We believe that in considering all aspects of
a Bank’s operation, the Bank can truly “know itself”.
No comments:
Post a Comment