Sunday, August 25, 2013




Changes in Reg. Z Abound! Are you ready for 2014?     

For most of our clients there is a great deal of energy (worry?) being expended while getting prepared for the new mortgage rules that will come into effect at the beginning of 2014.  Chief among these are the rules that apply to higher priced mortgages also known as “qualified mortgages” or “QM”.  

Ability to Repay and Qualified Mortgages   

Since 2009, Regulation Z has required that creditors assess the ability of a borrower to repay loans that are designated higher price loans[1]  In 2010 the requirement to consider the ability to pay was greatly expanded and now includes almost all closed- in consumer transactions that are secured by a dwelling.  .  

The 2010 regulations also established “qualified loans” and along with, a presumption of compliance for creditors that make qualified loans.  As with many regulations, there is some good news and some bad news.  The good news is that if your bank makes qualified mortgages that are not high priced, there is an irrefutable presumption that the ATR requirements have been met and significantly reduced liability follows. 

When does the Rule “Kick In”?  

The complete set of rules will take effect for any application that is received on or after January 10, 2014.   The CFPB has noted that examiners will start testing for compliance “after a reasonable time” which generally means about six months after implementation. 

The rules apply to all consumer transactions that are closed end and are secured by real estate.  This means that these rules are not limited to first liens or primary residences.   There are a few exceptions to the QM/ATR rules.  These are;   

1.       HELOCS
2.       Time-Shares
3.       Reverse Mortgages
4.       Construction or temporary loans
5.       Consumer loan secured by vacant land
 

For all loan applications accepted after this date, the Bank must keep a record of its documentation of ability to pay for these from the date of receipt.  

  
Ability to Repay    

Although the rules do not specifically state the underwriting guidelines for a bank, there are 8 factors that must be included in credit analysis

                                                               i.            Current or reasonable expected income or assets (not including the property) that the borrower will use to repay

                                                             ii.            Current employment status

                                                           iii.            Monthly mortgage payment for this loan (using the fully indexed rate or full amortizing payments-whichever is higher )

                                                           iv.            Monthly payments on any simultaneous loans securing the property

                                                             v.            Monthly payments for property taxes and insurance that is required by the bank; homeowners fees

                                                           vi.            Debts, alimony and child support

                                                          vii.            Monthly debt ratio as a ration of gross monthly income

                                                        viii.            Credit history 

 
Others factors can be used, but these 8 must be included at a minimum    Verification of this information can be documented by various means, but they must be documented and maintained for three years after the receipt of the application!   There is a list of acceptable documents in the regulation guide including records from government agencies, statements provided by a cooperative or homeowners association, lease agreements, credit reports, etc.  

The guidance in this area is clear that there are many different factors that can be considered when considering whether or the determination of ATR was reasonable.    Two strong factors in determining whether or not a loan decision was reasonable are:

·       You used a standard set of underwriting standards that have been proven to show a low rate of delinquency and/or default

·       The particular borrower has paid on time for a significant part of the loan since the rate adjusted or re-set.  

On the other hand there are considerations that indicate that the ATR decision was NOT in good faith.  These include:

·       Ignored underwriting standards (a large number of exceptions to policy)

·       Inconsistent application of underwriting standards

·       Early defaults in loans (without a catastrophe)  

There are specific guidelines for the way to calculate the DTI ratios for the borrower.  In summary, these rules direct the lender to use the worst case scenario to determine ATR.  That is, use the highest payment that the borrower will have to make under the loan terms as well as the amount of income that can be reasonably established.   

Why Should I care whether the loan is Qualified or not?  

The whole “quid pro quo” in this area is powerful.  In the event that a loan is not determined to be qualified and the borrower defaults, it is the borrower who can sue the Bank.  A successful suit for not properly qualifying a borrower can result in the Bank paying the customer three years’ worth of interest and fees.  This, by the way, is the reason that records must be retained for three years from the date of the loan origination.  

On the other hand, if the loan is qualified and not a high cost loan, then there is a presumption that the Bank properly considered the borrowers ATR.  The Bank wins! 

What is a Qualified Mortgage?

There are two characteristics that qualified mortgages should have. 

·       The DTI should not exceed 43 percent

·       The points and fees should not exceed 3% [2]

Neither of these characteristics is directly required by the regulation, but these are guidelines that will be used by regulators.   In the event that the loan is considered a high-priced, loan, the presumption that the Bank has established ATR is a rebuttable one.  The borrower would have to meet a high standard to show that Bank did not properly consider ATR 

Conclusion

The CFPB is considering making exceptions for small lenders.  However, we advise that all banks should  prepare to meet the QM/ATR standard as much as possible. 



[1] Higher-priced loans are generally defined as having an annual percentage rate (APR) that, as of the date the interest rate is set, exceeds the Average Prime Offer Rate (APOR) by 1.5 percentage points or more for first-lien loans and 3.5 percentage points or more for subordinate-lien loans
[2] For loans less than $100,000 there is a schedule of points and fees that will qualify the loan


[1] Higher-priced loans are generally defined as having an annual percentage rate (APR) that, as of the date the interest rate is set, exceeds the Average Prime Offer Rate (APOR) by 1.5 percentage points or more for first-lien loans and 3.5 percentage points or more for subordinate-lien loans
[2] For loans less than $100,000 there is a schedule of points and fees that will qualify the loan

No comments:

Post a Comment